<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Murdoch, people wont pay for news online (apparently)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calumbrannan.com/2009/09/dear-murdoch-people-wont-pay-for-news-online-apparently/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calumbrannan.com/2009/09/dear-murdoch-people-wont-pay-for-news-online-apparently/</link>
	<description>This is the personal home of technology entrepreneur and social networking expert Calum Brannan, who lives and plays in Coventry (sometimes London). Dig deep to discover my projects and follow my thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Fowler</title>
		<link>http://calumbrannan.com/2009/09/dear-murdoch-people-wont-pay-for-news-online-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Fowler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 04:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calumbrannan.com/?p=242#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Surely, SURELY, nobody would pay online for news. I think that&#039;s completely insane, I&#039;m sorry. I know it&#039;s quite a nonsensical view for me to take, and I&#039;m glad the industry is trying to move with the times, but I just can&#039;t see this working out at all well for them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;d have thought everyone who was using the internet for their news wouldn&#039;t be paying for it, and anyone who would think that was a good idea would still be just reading the newspaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely, SURELY, nobody would pay online for news. I think that&#39;s completely insane, I&#39;m sorry. I know it&#39;s quite a nonsensical view for me to take, and I&#39;m glad the industry is trying to move with the times, but I just can&#39;t see this working out at all well for them.</p>
<p>I&#39;d have thought everyone who was using the internet for their news wouldn&#39;t be paying for it, and anyone who would think that was a good idea would still be just reading the newspaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Fowler</title>
		<link>http://calumbrannan.com/2009/09/dear-murdoch-people-wont-pay-for-news-online-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Fowler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calumbrannan.com/?p=242#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Surely, SURELY, nobody would pay online for news. I think that&#039;s completely insane, I&#039;m sorry. I know it&#039;s quite a nonsensical view for me to take, and I&#039;m glad the industry is trying to move with the times, but I just can&#039;t see this working out at all well for them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;d have thought everyone who was using the internet for their news wouldn&#039;t be paying for it, and anyone who would think that was a good idea would still be just reading the newspaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely, SURELY, nobody would pay online for news. I think that&#39;s completely insane, I&#39;m sorry. I know it&#39;s quite a nonsensical view for me to take, and I&#39;m glad the industry is trying to move with the times, but I just can&#39;t see this working out at all well for them.</p>
<p>I&#39;d have thought everyone who was using the internet for their news wouldn&#39;t be paying for it, and anyone who would think that was a good idea would still be just reading the newspaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

